The Sinner, Dr. Indifference and the Thin Man

Since I live in Massachusetts, it’s my privilege to encounter “pro-life” Catholics. That is, they’re in full agreement with the Church’s teaching that abortion is a terrible evil, but they can’t see forcing their morality upon others.

Of course, Dr. Paul passes the ideological purity test. He’s opposed to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for the same sorts of reasons he would oppose a nation-wide pro-life law. Unlike the “pro-life” Catholics above, he realizes that the overturning of Roe v. Wade (and Doe v. Bolton) would not make abortion illegal in all 50 states.

So I wouldn’t be able to have this short dialog with Dr. Paul as I would with the “pro-life” Catholics. P-LC: “Oh, I don’t want to force my morality on others.” Me: “So do you oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964?” P-LC: “Oh no. Discrimination is wrong!” Me: “So you’re okay with forcing your morality on others?” Thankfully, most Americans are not as ideologically pure as Dr. Paul.

Ryszard Legutko points out that liberals (in America, this would include conservatives and libertarians) focus on procedure. They might agree with you with an expression of empathy, but they will say that the First Amendment protection of free speech allows that a nude strip club be placed in your neighborhood. And that, they will say, is the end of the argument. And in Dr. Paul’s eyes, President Lincoln committed the unpardonable sin of ignoring the Constitution during a rebellion that threatened to destroy the union (“How dare he!”).

Suppose that there were a pond in a park. Surrounding that pond is grass. Ringing both the pond and the grass is a path for those to enjoy the park. There is a man in the pond. The man is drowning. I imagine Dr. Paul as a man who would see the drowning man, and upon seeing the sign, “Keep off the grass!”, he would start looking for a non-grassy path to the pond. As Mark Shea notes, the Constitution is sacred scripture for Ron Paul.

Ryszard Legutko also notes that liberals have a thin anthropology. While procedure would have Dr. Paul indifferent to the plight of the unborn, Ron Paul is not the thinness of the big three. As almost everyone perceives, the Thin Man is Mitt Romney. I’m reminded of this quote of Kirkegaard’s that Peter Kreeft brought up in one of his talks.

Let others complain that the times are wicked. I complain that they are paltry; for they are without passion. The thoughts of men are thin and frail like lace, and they themselves are feeble like girl lace-makers. The thoughts of their hearts are too puny to be sinful. For a worm it might conceivably be regarded a sin to harbor thoughts such as theirs, not for a man who is formed in the image of God. Their lusts are staid and sluggish, their passions sleepy; they do their duty, these sordid minds, but permit themselves, as did the Jews, to trim the coins just the least little bit, thinking that if our Lord keep tab of them ever so carefully one might yet safely venture to fool him a bit. Fye upon them! It is therefore my soul ever returns to the Old Testament and to Shakespeare. There at least one feels that one is dealing with men and women; there one hates and loves, there one murders one’s enemy and curses his issue through all generations—there one sins.

At the opposite pole, the passionate Sinner is Rick Santorum. He seems to have a passion for justice, and even when he sins, it is borne of a passion for justice. He does have a blood lust against the enemy. He’s infected with the neoconservative fever for war. I would love to ask Rick, “You’ve spoken eloquently about the human dignity of all men, including the yet to be born. What happened to the human dignity of the men you would have tortured or subjected to so-called ‘enhanced interrogation’?”

Of the big three, the Thin Man, Dr. Indifference, and the Sinner, I find myself drawn to the thickest of the three, the Sinner. It’s not that I support his sins, but that I see him to have the greatest potential for an interior conversion. Like the militant saints of St. Ignatius or St. Francis who once desired war, God has something to work with. There is meat on the Sinner’s bones.

I don’t dislike Dr. Indifference. His thickness comes from his passion for ideological purity. He would martyr his campaign for the cause. And so he is much preferred to the Thin Man.

As for the Thin Man, I don’t have much to say about him.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Michael Voris and Amazing Grace

There is no doubt that Michael Voris stirs things up. Voris claims to cut through the clutter and expose what’s wrong with the Catholic world. Many conservative Catholics — who are figuratively dying to get the capital ‘T” Truth out and who tire of waiting for Catholic bishops to grow a spine and speak the Truth (without all the watering-down caveats) — are embracing Voris’ take-no-prisoners approach. There are other conservative Catholics who dislike Voris’ video productions on tone and substance.

In this blog post, Mark Shea takes on Voris, in the way that only Mark Shea can. It’s full of life and passion, and I respect that. Some might say that Michael Voris uses a similar style. I disagree. For one, Voris seems to enjoy creating an Us versus Them situation (in which those who support Voris are Us, and those who oppose Voris are Them). And the focus on anger and outrage (whether justified or not) creates a cartoon image, “HULK SMASH!!”

There are some revolutions, in which all control is lost.

On this particular issue, I think Voris is partially correct. I long for a Latin Liturgy to return the Chant to a pride of place. However, whether or not “Amazing Grace” should be sung by Catholics is another issue altogether. I happen to like this song, and I fear that a Harry Potter-like debate will ensue on the theological merits of the song. In this, Voris has moved the debate into a place it does not need to be. There will be emotional squabbles about the song itself, setting up two opposing camps with pitchforks pointed at each. Michael Voris is a divider.

A simpler approach, one that treads on safer ground, is to point out that “Amazing Grace” is not chant. But then again, this is America where egalitarian opinions would demand that “Amazing Grace” is in seamless artistic harmony with chant. America will probably be the last country to eliminate widespread liturgical abuse.

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment

Walk in the Wilderness

A Walk in the Wilderness

Today, I took a took an eight and a half mile walk from Maynard to Hudson, MA (click on the picture to the left for a more detailed map). The  first stop was at St. Bridgets, praying the Rosary and then daily Mass.

After Mass finished at 9:30 am, I made the first of many crossings of the Assabet River. While I walked, I was in awe of the greenery of New England. It would not take long for the trees and plants to over take any area which had been cut.

After the river is the Stow line, and Erikson’s Ice Cream. Unfortunately, it was too early to purchase ice cream.

Near the Stow Shopping Center is a bit of history. First it was merely Paul Revere’s Midnight Ride. Then it turns out that there was another guy named Dawes who rode too. Well, it turns out that Dr. Samuel Prescott (who happened to be out at night a little too late with a lady friend) met up with Revere and Dawes. It turns out that Prescott completed Revere’s ride to Concord (Revere was captured) and continued on to Gardner’s Inn (I’m not sure of the name here) in Stow.

I stopped to purchase a drink at Shaw’s in the shopping center. The blacktop added 15 degrees to the day’s heat. And then I passed the Stow Police Station and neighbor Union Church of Stow. It’s a plain white church with decorative stain glass windows.

The next stop was in the center of town, at the Unitarian Church of Stow and Acton. This was the fourth building that held the First Parish of Stow, and in the previous buildings, they were also town meeting halls. People tend to forget that the Puritans had no separation of church and state. Their idea of religious freedom included a combination of church and state. If I remember correctly, the parish voted to become Unitarian in 1840 (Congregational Churches would vote on doctrine). The bell, since recast, was made by Paul Revere & Sons.

Next stop was the Randall Library which does have Internet access, however I suspect their machines are severely infected with viruses because of poor performance. I sat down at the several war monuments in front of the library.

I tried to make a stop at St. Isidore’s, just past the town center, however I found the front doors were locked. I stopped at Russell’s Convenience Store for a drink and a snack and then headed toward Hudson.

This was the worse part of the trip. While the walk along Rt 117 was pleasant with trees for shade and sidewalks, the trip south (actually 62 West) on Rt 62 toward Hudson was uncomfortable. There were no sidewalks and various parts of the road were so narrow that I was forced to walk on the road. Additionally, there was a high volume of traffic (which kicked up dirt and sand).

The one point of history was a marker for Pompositticut Plantation in 1630 (what Stow was called before becoming incorporated as Stow). There are a couple of golf courses off of the road which are not visible. The Stow portion of the road has a lot of curves, but crossing over the Hudson line, there tends to be more straightaways. There is definitely less shade in Hudson, than Stow. It seems that Hudson keeps the trees and brush away from the road, while Stow is much more tolerant of growth.

Before getting to Hudson’s Main Street, I passed the Hudson Gun Club and entered the bike trail constructed over the old railway line (Assabet River Rail Trail). I ate at Main Street Pizza and Subs just off the trail and I recommend the place. Customer service is friendly, and seem to remember their repeat customers. Additionally, there are a couple of pictures of the Blessed Virgin Mary hanging near the cash registers.

The final stage of the journey was tough due to the lack of shade and the time (it was afternoon). I passed a friendly mother and her child, but it seemed that most were keeping off the trail due to the heat. I decided to avoid the planned stops at St. Michael’s, the Unitarian Church of Hudson and Marlboro and St. Luke’s Episcopal because it was close to home and because of dehydration. I made a stop at the Hudson Library to cool down and get early access to the Internet. It turned out that I needed a card number (which I don’t  have), so I enjoyed the air conditioning for a bit, before heading for Central Street Market for a drink before the final leg home.

Overall, the walk was good, except for the portion between Hudson and Stow. Both Hudson and Stow have sidewalks or trails for an enjoyable walk except that the two towns are not connected. Stow is more fun because of the shade and the points of historical interest.

Posted in Miscellanea | 1 Comment

NPR throws away principles in religious reporting

Some folks admire NPR for its quality of reporting. This is not an example of quality reporting.

The issue at hand is NPR’s claim that women have been ordained as Roman Catholic priests. Over at his blog, Fr Z is clear:

No woman can ever be validly ordained a priest.

This is not merely a rule, but it is also a teaching of the Catholic Church.  The Church teaches that she is powerless to ordain women. For those who believe that the Pope has magical powers to declare anything to be true, and change teachings and rules on a mere whim, this must be difficult to understand. They are probably scratching their heads, saying, “What? The Catholic Church is powerless? That’s not my idea of the Catholic Church.”

Sadly, it is very hard for people to shake off their perceptions for what is real and true. At his blog, Father Z continues to correct a very flawed NPR article and over at her blog, Stacy Trasancos points out the meaning of “pretend”.

And this brings up an interesting point, how would NPR treat someone who was falsely but seriously claiming to be a U.S. senator or the CEO of a large corporation like GM? What if that person claimed she was a surgeon or psychiatrist?

Additionally, there are clues that the author of the NPR piece recognizes that a woman claiming to be ordained as a Catholic priest is a controversial issue. But as journalist Mollie Hemingway points out, the author of the piece ignores some basic rules of reporting:

Did I mention that nowhere in the entire story is an official within the actual Roman Catholic Church quoted? Isn’t that weird?

I know that stories about Roman Catholic Womenpriests and other similar groups are like catnip for reporters, but we shouldn’t just throw out all of our reporting principles. When the whole point of the story revolves around a disputed claim, it’s usually not a good idea to ignore one side.

This isn’t about picking sides or favoring one group over another but, simply, giving readers information. It’s a journalism thing.

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment

Is this the end of the nation?

A friend writes,

Robert, what happened in NY is the end of the nation, isn’t it? I am forecasting that the tax system as well as business will collapse under a new avenue for people to abuse marriage laws. How are you staying chipper in the midst of what we now witness?

( I’m open to being reassured that all will be well. )

Even when we know of things such as the fall of Rome, historians still dispute the actual year of the fall (many will attach it to the death of the last Roman emperor in the West, who was completely powerless).

I hesitate to say that any one thing marks the fall, because for one, it comes off too shrill. Secondly, people will see that the nation is still muddling along despite these bad decisions.

It’s a bit like bundling the straw of bad decisions on a camel’s back (that is, the nation’s back). We really don’t know when or which bad decision will break the back and cause a collapse. We may be in collapse now, or we may be re-invigorated through a dictatorship (which often happens when a culture loses the capacity for self-rule).

I’m certain that the following attacks on the family are fatal
1) Contraception (with abortion being the last resort for failed contraception). This changed the meaning of sex, and later, with abortion, the meaning of the human person.
2) Divorce, especially no-fault divorce, in which marriage is no longer life-long.
3) Same-sex “marriage” removes procreation from the purpose of marriage.

I’m a little less certain of this, but on the political side we’ve become too individualistic and libertarian. There needs to be a balance between individualism and communitarianism (and that balance rests on the family, which is the basic unit of civilization). It may seem like a paradox, but as the family and other social institutions collapse, that rugged individualism we admire turns into dependence on the state. We are becoming dependent on government to ensure our welfare, which occurred most recently in the passage of a massive healthcare bill. Our bloated welfare state is turning into the bread and circuses of Rome.

From my reading of history, Rome fell to the barbarians for two basic reasons.
1) De-population.
2) Loss of virtue – Romans became pleasure-seeking.

The seed of hope rests in the fact that America is a deeply religious nation. I admit that the walls of Protestantism are crumbling. But there is hope that Catholicism can re-vitalize Christianity in the nation. Catholicism has the intellectual firepower to defeat secular humanism. And when people turn back toward God, they will regain the capacity for self-governing because they have become virtuous again.

BTW, my capacity to remain chipper does not correspond at all to the current news. The source of happiness remains with God, and so what peace and solace I find is more related to an effective prayer life. I’m always seeking to improve this, even though I stumble a bit here and there (I’m currently in a stumbling period).

I hope that you find something useful in all that.

There’s another thing. Catholicism has a robust theology on suffering. As the nation feels the strain of its bad decisions, it would be useful for individual Catholics to be prepared to assist Christ in transforming that suffering-to-come into grace.

Posted in Morality, Politics | Leave a comment

Re-opening the Blog

After several years of neglect, I’m going to start posting again to Whispers in the Wasteland. I’m going to keep Agapas Me as a place for the deeper philosophical and theological reflections, and use Whispers for quick commentary. I hope the kindling from Whispers will feed the fires for Agapas Me.

This is an open post. Please feel free to post any comments you like (within the limits of good taste). The comments can be about old posts, site design, any topic you might like to see posted in the future, or anything that is of interest to you. I’m trying out something new with respect to comments (so as to reduce spam), so I’d like to know if there are problems with comments.

The first time you comment to this blog, the comment should be held in moderation. After I approve your first comment, that comment will appear, and follow up comments should appear without the need for moderation.

Posted in Miscellanea | 2 Comments

Agapas Me

Out with the old, and in with the new. Whispers in the Wastleland is now the old defunct blog. It hasn’t been updated in a year.

Agapas Me is the new blog which I will use as I prepare for total consecration To Jesus Through Mary (according to the formula described by St. Louis de Montfort). The day of consecration will be on the solemnity of the Immaculate Conception of Our Lady, the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Agapas Me is the question Jesus Christ asked of St. Peter, after Peter’s three denials of Jesus and after Christ’s resurrection. Jesus asked, “Simon son of John, do you love me?” (John 21:15)

In Greek, “Agapas Me?” means “Do you love Me?” and Jesus is using the word for love, agape, which translates to an unconditional self-sacrificing love. The exchange between Jesus and Peter in John 21 is something I’ve been meditiating over for quite some time.

The new blog will be found here –> http://blog.agapasme.com/

While the first blog entry of the new blog has not been written yet, I expect it will be done before the day is finished. God Bless.

Posted in Miscellanea | Comments Off

Whispers in the Wasteland

I’ve been contemplating another name change for the blog, and today’s first reading (Year A – 19th Sunday in ordinary time) seems to be appropiate way to close out the old way in preparation for the new way. I’ve given more context than supplied by today’s reading (1 Kings 19:3-13):
Elijah was afraid and fled for his life, going to Beer-sheba of Judah. He left his servant there and went a day’s journey into the desert, until he came to a broom tree and sat beneath it. He prayed for death: “This is enough, O LORD! Take my life, for I am no better than my fathers.” He lay down and fell asleep under the broom tree, but then an angel touched him and ordered him to get up and eat. He looked and there at his head was a hearth cake and a jug of water. After he ate and drank, he lay down again, but the angel of the LORD came back a second time, touched him, and ordered, “Get up and eat, else the journey will be too long for you!” He got up, ate and drank; then strengthened by that food, he walked forty days and forty nights to the mountain of God, Horeb.
There he came to a cave, where he took shelter. But the word of the LORD came to him, “Why are you here, Elijah?” He answered: “I have been most zealous for the LORD, the God of hosts, but the Israelites have forsaken your covenant, torn down your altars, and put your prophets to the sword. I alone am left, and they seek to take my life.” Then the LORD said, “Go outside and stand on the mountain before the LORD; the LORD will be passing by.” A strong and heavy wind was rending the mountains and crushing rocks before the LORD–but the LORD was not in the wind. After the wind there was an earthquake–but the LORD was not in the earthquake. After the earthquake there was fire–but the LORD was not in the fire. After the fire there was a tiny whispering sound. When he heard this, Elijah hid his face in his cloak and went and stood at the entrance of the cave. A voice said to him, “Elijah, why are you here?”

Posted in Miscellanea | Comments Off

The Rise and Fall of Colleen Applegate

As Mr. McClarey puts it, “a pro-Playboy troll comes to Open Book.” A commentor at Amy Welborn’s blog sings praises of the Playboy track to stardom. He cites Pamela Anderson, Jenny McCarthy, and Tara Patrick (Carmen Electra) as examples.

My reply follows…

Oh, it’s a little bit of centerfold gamesmanship, is it?

Well, I’ll call your Pamela Anderson, and raise you a Colleen Applegate.

What? You’ve never heard of her? Oh, that’s probably because she’s dead. Although she gathered more fame as a dead porn star, she’s largely forgotten now. The young 20-year-old girl came from Nowhere, Minnesota and struck out for Hollywood, California for her 15 minutes of fame. People Weekly describes her first steps to stardom:

A few weeks after leaving, Colleen called with an odd piece of good news: She was working as a model and earning $100 a day, more than her father was making. She didn’t mention that she’d answered a newspaper ad for the World Modeling Agency in Van Nuys and had begun posing nude for magazine photographers.

PBS is more antiseptic, they can’t be bothered to reveal her name:

She was from Minnesota. Young, pretty, and fresh. She went to Hollywood in search of a dream and found herself in X-rated movies, on drugs, and estranged from her family and friends.

Yeah, she made it to the “top.” One week she’s clinking champagne glasses with Francis Ford Coppola at the Erotic Film Awards, and the next week, well… “Two years to the month after she left Farmington, Colleen Applegate came home to be buried.”

Such are the wages of the culture of death.

Posted in Miscellanea | 3 Comments

Visions of the Wasteland

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.

     Frisch weht der Wind
     Der Heimat zu.
     Mein Irisch Kind,
     Wo weilest du?
‘You gave me hyacinths first a year ago;
‘They called me the hyacinth girl.’
–Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden,
Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not
Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither
Living nor dead, and I knew nothing,
Looking into the heart of light, the silence.

Od’ und leer das Meer.

Thus, I began a new direction on this blog, decrying the weakness of modern conservatism. Formerly this blog was called Voice in the Wilderness, but I felt the title was unoriginal and I did not have the courage to claim that I was following in the footsteps of John the Baptist. So I softened it to Whispers in the Wasteland, searched for an appropriate biblical quote — there are a few places where whispers and wastelands are mentioned — but none seemed appropriate.

The title of the website is a play on the etymology of the word hermit. Indeed, also valid for this site is Eremite’s Wilderness or eremites wilderness which would mean desert wilderness when the Greek word is translated. Additionally, there are some interesting personal connections. My mother grew up in a village Saint Antoine, more properly, the parish of Saint Antoine L’Ermite, named after Saint Anthony the hermit of the Egyptian desert. Saint Anthony is considered to be the founder of Christian monasticism. My father grew up in a nearby village Notre Dame (Our Lady). My parents married in my mother’s parish and my birthday is the feast day of Our Lady of Lourdes (however, my actual day of birth was on a Sunday). The healing waters of Lourdes and the desert are quite a contrast and yet, naturally, I’ve come to think of the Church as an oasis in the wasteland.

So when Pope Benedict XVI spoke of deserts and water during the homily of his installation Mass, I knew I had found a match, an appropriate signature quote for the blog (n.b. Saint Benedict is the founder of western monasticism):

Continue reading

Posted in Religion | 1 Comment